Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


HemphillDissertationDoc_final.pdf (636.61 KB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Disease-related collaboration and adjustment among couples coping with type 2 diabetes

Hemphill, Rachel C.
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1372687634

Abstract Details

2013, PHD, Kent State University, College of Arts and Sciences / Department of Psychological Sciences.
Coping with chronic illness often takes place within the context of the marital relationship. Among married couples, collaborative efforts to cope with one partner’s chronic health condition have been linked to a range of positive outcomes, including better disease management among patients and greater emotional and interpersonal adjustment among patients and their spouses. Theory suggests that dyadic forms of coping with disease, such as collaboration, may be more beneficial when they are consistent with, or match, partners’ appraisal of who is responsible (couple vs. patient) for managing the patient’s disease. Very few studies, however, have examined this possibility. The current study of couples coping with one partner’s diabetes addressed this research gap by investigating whether disease-related collaboration was more strongly related to better adjustment among partners who view diabetes management as their shared responsibility compared to those who view diabetes management as the patient’s responsibility alone. Three major areas of adjustment were examined: 1) patients’ disease management; 2) patients’ and spouses’ emotional well-being; and 3) patients’ and spouses’ relationship quality. Participants were 126 married couples in which one partner (the patient) was at least 55 years old and had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for at least one year and the other partner (the spouse) did not have diabetes. Patients and spouses separately completed a baseline interview and 24-day electronic daily diary. Predictor variables were derived from interviews; outcome variables were derived from daily diary records, and daily assessments of outcomes were aggregated across the entire diary period. Study hypotheses were tested using regression analysis and dyadic multilevel modeling. Results indicated that disease-related collaboration was linked to more positive psychosocial outcomes among patients in “shared responsibility” couples compared to patients in “patient responsibility” couples. In contrast, collaboration had mixed associations with spouses’ psychosocial outcomes, and none of these associations depended on partners’ appraisal of responsibility for diabetes management. Overall, findings suggest that match between partners’ collaborative efforts to cope with diabetes and their appraisal of disease management is important for the daily psychosocial adjustment of patients, but not for that of spouses. Implications for theory and intervention are discussed.
Mary Ann Parris Stephens, PhD (Advisor)
108 p.
Aging; Behavioral Sciences; Health; Personal Relationships; Psychology; Social Psychology
dyadic coping; collaborative coping; type 2 diabetes; married couples; chronic disease management; psychosocial adjustment; older adults

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Hemphill, R. C. (2013). Disease-related collaboration and adjustment among couples coping with type 2 diabetes [Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1372687634

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Hemphill, Rachel. Disease-related collaboration and adjustment among couples coping with type 2 diabetes. 2013. Kent State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1372687634.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Hemphill, Rachel. "Disease-related collaboration and adjustment among couples coping with type 2 diabetes." Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1372687634

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

kent1372687634
762
© 2013, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Kent State University and OhioLINK.