Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


Full draft V9 11_30_15.pdf (1.55 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

A MACDONALD'S SENTENCE STYLE DISCIPLINARITY ANALYSIS OF HONORS THESES IN THREE GENRES

Goldstein, Dayna Virginia
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1448903384

Abstract Details

2015, PHD, Kent State University, College of Arts and Sciences / Department of English.
This dissertation examines the development of expert discourse in writing across the disciplines and specifically the transition from novice to expert in student writers. The novice writing examined is a sample of honors theses from three distinct disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. The honors theses represents a high level of academic writing in the undergraduate university setting and as a genre seeks to approximate expert disciplinary prose. To facilitate comparison between novice, honors theses prose and expert prose, the study applies Susan Peck MacDonald’s Method for Analyzing Sentence-Level Differences in Disciplinary Knowledge Making (1992) and MacDonald’s 1994 data based on expert prose for comparison. Each sentence subject of three honors theses each from Literature, History, and Anthropology respectively were coded as either epistemic or phenomenal and compared to MacDonald’s expert results as comprehensively as possible. Findings indicate that the literature students were like the experts phenomenlogically, with an emphasis on particulars; history students were remarkably similar to their expert counterparts epistemically, and the anthropology results were incoherent. An exceptional phenomenological “I” code had to be added to account for novice forms of academic agency. The implications of this project include some institution specific trends in honors education and the need to rethink academic agency for novices. A reformulation of the subject/object assumption used in MacDonald’s coding scheme is suggested. The reformulation of the subject/object dichotomy s theorized using Pearce’s notion of abduction.
Raymond Craig (Advisor)
Ronald Corthell (Advisor)
Donald William (Committee Member)
Michael Pemberton (Committee Member)
William Kist (Committee Member)
246 p.
Education; Education History; Literacy; Sociolinguistics
Writing; Disciplinarity; Susan Peck MacDonald; Honors Theses;

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Goldstein, D. V. (2015). A MACDONALD'S SENTENCE STYLE DISCIPLINARITY ANALYSIS OF HONORS THESES IN THREE GENRES [Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1448903384

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Goldstein, Dayna. A MACDONALD'S SENTENCE STYLE DISCIPLINARITY ANALYSIS OF HONORS THESES IN THREE GENRES. 2015. Kent State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1448903384.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Goldstein, Dayna. "A MACDONALD'S SENTENCE STYLE DISCIPLINARITY ANALYSIS OF HONORS THESES IN THREE GENRES." Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 2015. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=kent1448903384

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

kent1448903384
887
© 2015, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Kent State University and OhioLINK.