Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
osu1123278702.pdf (839.93 KB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Modelling and resampling based multiple testing with applications to genetics
Author Info
Huang, Yifan
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1123278702
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2005, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, Statistics.
Abstract
Multiple hypotheses testing is a common problem in practice. For instance, in microarray experiments, whether the goal is to select maintenance genes for normalization or to identify differentially expressed genes between samples, multiple genes are under consideration. Multiplicity inflates the type I error rate of the hypothesis testing, so we need to adjust the testing procedure to control the overly error rate. My research focuses on the strong control of Familywise Error Rate (FWER). There are mainly two different types of approaches to multiple testing. One is modelling based approach and the other non-modelling based. Modelling based approaches fit models to the data so that the joint distribution of the test statistics is tractable. Non-modelling based approaches consist of inequality based methods and resampling based methods. They require less or no information about the joint distribution of the test statistics. I have shown in Chapter 1 that frequently used Hochberg's step-up method is a special case of partition testing based on Simes' test. This is a new result. Hochberg's step-up method is an inequity based non-modelling partition testing. Modelling based partition testing is applicable whether the joint distribution of the test statistics is known or not. By applying modelling based partition testing when the joint distribution of test statistics is known, I illustrate that modelling based approaches are often more powerful than inequality based non-modelling approaches. In Chapter 2, I construct counterexamples to the validity of permutation test, demonstrating that the resampling based methods are often invalid. My results suggest recommendation of modelling based approaches. When the joint distribution of the test statistics is untractable, modelling followed by bootstrap can be applied. I use modelling followed by bootstrap in Chapter 3 to select maintenance genes for normalizing the gene expression data.
Committee
Jason Hsu (Advisor)
Keywords
Rejection regions
;
step-up method
;
¿¿¿¿2
;
partition testing
;
¿¿¿¿1
;
H0
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Huang, Y. (2005).
Modelling and resampling based multiple testing with applications to genetics
[Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1123278702
APA Style (7th edition)
Huang, Yifan.
Modelling and resampling based multiple testing with applications to genetics.
2005. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1123278702.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Huang, Yifan. "Modelling and resampling based multiple testing with applications to genetics." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2005. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1123278702
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
osu1123278702
Download Count:
694
Copyright Info
© 2005, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.