Skip to Main Content
Frequently Asked Questions
Submit an ETD
Global Search Box
Need Help?
Keyword Search
Participating Institutions
Advanced Search
School Logo
Files
File List
osu1336658092.pdf (3.39 MB)
ETD Abstract Container
Abstract Header
Identifying and addressing student difficulties and misconceptions: examples from physics and from materials science and engineering
Author Info
Rosenblatt, Rebecca J.
Permalink:
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1336658092
Abstract Details
Year and Degree
2012, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, Physics.
Abstract
Here I present my work identifying and addressing student difficulties with several materials science and physics topics. In the first part of this thesis, I present my work identifying student difficulties and misconceptions about the directional relationships between net force, velocity, and acceleration in one dimension. This is accomplished primarily through the discussion of the development, validation, and results of implementation of the FVA test, a research-oriented multiple-choice assessment instrument. In the second part of this thesis, I present my work identifying and addressing student difficulties in materials science through the design, implementation, and assessment of group work concept oriented tutorials. These tutorials were designed to mimic the tutorials developed by the University of Washington and the University of Maine and known to be effective in physics education. In addition, these tutorials include several teaching techniques found to be effective in physics education such as multiple representations, cognitive conflict, i.e. elicit-confront-resolve, and student dialog questions. While these tutorials still have a lot of room for improvement, the results suggest that these tutorials and recitation methods are effective in teaching students the difficult and important conceptual materials which they were designed to address. Furthermore, since the general design process used was not specific to that of materials science, there are wider implications that this process may be successful for a wide range of STEM courses. In this second part, I also discuss the development of a second multiple-choice assessment instrument which is designed to be more of an instructional tool, although it has been used for research as well to assess student conceptual understanding of the introductory materials science and engineering course.
Committee
Andrew Heckler, PhD (Advisor)
Bao Lei, PhD (Committee Member)
Patton Bruce, PhD (Committee Member)
Nandini Trivedi, PhD (Committee Member)
Pages
171 p.
Subject Headings
Educational Tests and Measurements
;
Materials Science
;
Physics
Keywords
Physics. Materials science and engineering. Education research. Student difficulties. Tutorial design. Test development and design..
Recommended Citations
Refworks
EndNote
RIS
Mendeley
Citations
Rosenblatt, R. J. (2012).
Identifying and addressing student difficulties and misconceptions: examples from physics and from materials science and engineering
[Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1336658092
APA Style (7th edition)
Rosenblatt, Rebecca.
Identifying and addressing student difficulties and misconceptions: examples from physics and from materials science and engineering.
2012. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation.
OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center
, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1336658092.
MLA Style (8th edition)
Rosenblatt, Rebecca. "Identifying and addressing student difficulties and misconceptions: examples from physics and from materials science and engineering." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1336658092
Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)
Abstract Footer
Document number:
osu1336658092
Download Count:
6,621
Copyright Info
© 2012, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.