Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


osu1354197449.pdf (3.64 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Implant-Abutment Interface: A Comparison of the Ultimate Force to Cause Failure between Small Diameter Implant Systems

Mahmoud, Ahmad
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1354197449

Abstract Details

2012, Master of Science, Ohio State University, Dentistry.
Limited available alveolar ridge bone or space deficiencies are some of the challenging scenarios, which led to the development of the narrow diameter implants. Several dental implant companies have developed narrow diameter implants with different designs. Clinicians often have concerns about the durability and function of the narrow diameter implants. The purpose of this study was to explore and compare the ultimate failure resistance of the smallest diameter of the two- stage type implant provided by five commonly used dental implant systems. Thirty implants (Astra OsseoSpeed 3.0mm and 3.5mm (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden), Straumann Bone Level 3.3mm (Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland), Zimmer Tapered Screw-Vent 3.7mm (Zimmer Dental Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), Biomet 3i Full OSSEOTITE Certain 3.25mm (Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA) and Noble Biocare Speedy Replace 3.5mm(Gothenburg, Nobel Biocare, Sweden)), five from each type, were tested in this study. A rigid clamp was used to hold the implants in a 30-degree angle to the static load vector. Load continued until the sample broke or obviously deformed. Peak loads were recorded at that point for all the studied implant systems. The mean fracture/deformation peak load values were 367.2 N, 568.8 N, 576.2 N, 802.8 N, 679.0 N and 553.4 N respectively. Generally, implants with larger diameters showed higher amount of load to failure, in comparison to narrower diameter implants. Ti-Al-V alloy implants generally took more force to cause failure than CP Ti implants. As always, laboratory results should be verified by clinical trials.
Edwin McGlumphy, Dr. (Advisor)
Robert Seghi, Dr. (Committee Member)
Peter Larsen, Dr. (Other)
34 p.
Dentistry
Implant-Abutment Interface: A Comparison of the Ultimate Force to Cause Failure between Small Diameter Implant Systems.

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Mahmoud, A. (2012). Implant-Abutment Interface: A Comparison of the Ultimate Force to Cause Failure between Small Diameter Implant Systems [Master's thesis, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1354197449

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Mahmoud, Ahmad. Implant-Abutment Interface: A Comparison of the Ultimate Force to Cause Failure between Small Diameter Implant Systems. 2012. Ohio State University, Master's thesis. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1354197449.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Mahmoud, Ahmad. "Implant-Abutment Interface: A Comparison of the Ultimate Force to Cause Failure between Small Diameter Implant Systems." Master's thesis, Ohio State University, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1354197449

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

osu1354197449
3,117
© 2012, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by The Ohio State University and OhioLINK.