Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

Putting the Power Back Into Empowerment: Construct Clarification and the Incorporation of Trust

Polin, Beth Marie

Abstract Details

2013, Doctor of Philosophy, Ohio State University, Labor and Human Resources.
Organizations that have an empowered workforce contain employees who may claim higher job satisfaction, higher organizational commitment, lower turnover intention, and better job performance, among other desirable outcomes. But to best achieve such attitudes and behaviors, it is critical that a clear conceptualization and operationalization of the empowered state and the empowerment process exist. This dissertation has two objectives. First, a clarified and more accurate definition of the empowered state is presented. Despite the ubiquitousness of empowerment, no clear conceptualization and thus operationalization exist for the construct. Keeping in mind its power roots and its multidimensional nature, the empowered state is defined as a psychological state reflecting autonomy, control, and accountability. By labeling this the empowered state instead of empowerment, the internal state of the employee can be better differentiated from the empowerment process. The second objective of this dissertation, then, is to present and verify such a model of the empowerment process, which includes actors and forces in the employee’s external environment. This model identifies the factors impacting the degree to which an employee experiences an empowered state, outcomes of the empowered state, and other mediating variables. The role of trust between a manager and an employee in the empowerment process—a relationship not yet studied in an empowerment context—is also examined. To test hypotheses concerning the empowered state and the empowerment process, data was gathered from part-time/working graduate students and their managers. A total of 108 manager-employee pairs were collected. Factor analysis, regression analyses, and indirect effects models were used in the data analysis process. Results partially support the proposed clarified definition of the empowered state. The suggested antecedents of access to information and resources and core self-evaluation show significant relationships with the empowered state. Mixed results emerge for competence, meaningfulness, and goal internalization being mediators of the relationship between antecedents and the empowered state. Both an employee’s trust judgments about their manager and a manager’s trust judgments about their employee are found to play a role in the empowerment process. Finally, a number of outcome variables are supported in the model. After findings are discussed, strengths and weaknesses of the study are offered, implications are proposed, and future research needs are identified.
Howard Klein (Advisor)
Roy Lewicki (Committee Member)
Robert Lount (Committee Member)
220 p.

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Polin, B. M. (2013). Putting the Power Back Into Empowerment: Construct Clarification and the Incorporation of Trust [Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1364903277

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Polin, Beth. Putting the Power Back Into Empowerment: Construct Clarification and the Incorporation of Trust. 2013. Ohio State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1364903277.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Polin, Beth. "Putting the Power Back Into Empowerment: Construct Clarification and the Incorporation of Trust." Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1364903277

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)