Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 
 

Files

File List


ucin1070396389.pdf (5.23 MB)

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

IMPERIAL REPRESENTATION UNDER DIOCLETIAN AND THE TETRARCHY

KIERNAN, PHILIP JAMES
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1070396389

Abstract Details

2004, MA, University of Cincinnati, Arts and Sciences : Classics.
The emperor Diocletian (A.D 284-305) established an entirely new system of governing the Roman world, which is known today as the "Tetrarchy." Diocletian's system saw four men, twoAugusti and two Caesars, sharing control of the Roman Empire and basing themselves in different geographical locations. As such, the Tetrarchs were able to deal with threats to the Empire's borders much more efficiently than one emperor. In order to contrast the Tetrarchs from the civil wars and usurpations of the fifty years that had preceded them, a new system ofimperial representation was developed. This thesis examines surviving examples of Tetrarchic imperial representation. This includes coins and medals of the Tetrarchs, porphyry statue groups,a monument of five columns in the Forum Romanum (the FŸnfsŠulendenkmal), the Arch of Galerius in Thessalonike, wall paintings at Luxor, and the so-called Arcus Novus in Rome. Onall of these monuments, the Tetrarchs are consistently shown as four equal emperors, but a single ruling unit. The new portraiture, costume and attributes of the Tetrarchs are thought to beintended to show the Tetrarchs as identical and equal. This concept, termed similitudo, was used to underscore the ideal of Tetrarchic harmony (concordia). Jupiter and Hercules find a specialplace in Tetrarchic representation as the patrons of the two Tetrarchic houses. The use of other personifications and divinities in Tetrarchic representation showed the divine prerogative,legitimacy and the universality of the Tetrarchic system. It is argued that Tetrarchic art and monuments do not represent a decline in Roman art as was once commonly thought. Instead, itseems that the Tetrarchy marks the beginning of a move towards more symbolic representation. The overall effect of these changes was to represent the Tetrarchs as a cohesive and powerfulruling unit.
Dr. C. Brian Rose (Advisor)
214 p.
Art History; History, Ancient
Diocletian; Tetrarchy; monuments; imperial

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • KIERNAN, P. J. (2004). IMPERIAL REPRESENTATION UNDER DIOCLETIAN AND THE TETRARCHY [Master's thesis, University of Cincinnati]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1070396389

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • KIERNAN, PHILIP. IMPERIAL REPRESENTATION UNDER DIOCLETIAN AND THE TETRARCHY. 2004. University of Cincinnati, Master's thesis. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1070396389.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • KIERNAN, PHILIP. "IMPERIAL REPRESENTATION UNDER DIOCLETIAN AND THE TETRARCHY." Master's thesis, University of Cincinnati, 2004. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1070396389

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

ucin1070396389
4,964
© 2004, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by University of Cincinnati and OhioLINK.