Objectives: The “gold standard” for the diagnosis of fat malabsorption, the 72 hour fatbalance study, requires a three day collection to generate a coefficient of fat absorption (CFA).
We hypothesized that, a new test using behenic acid (behenate test) as a nonabsorbable lipid
marker may provide a facile means to assess fat absorption. The study proposed to answer two
questions: 1) whether the “behenate test” correlated with the “gold standard” and 2) whether the
CFA improved when taking pancreatic enzymes during meals instead of prior to them.
Methods: The study compared the “behenate test” with the gold standard in 15 cystic
fibrosis patients during three arms which require 3-4 day hospitalizations: one taking pancreatic
enzymes prior to meals, one taking pancreatic enzymes during meals, and one off of pancreatic
enzymes.
Results: The mean CFA was 78.3% when pancreatic enzymes were taken during meals
and 80.4% when pancreatic enzymes were taken prior to meals. Correlation between the CFA
and the “behenate test” for collections during all 3 arms was r2 = 0.219 (p= 0.001).
Conclusion: 1) Timing of ingestion of pancreatic enzymes does not significantly alter the CFA.
2) Although the CFA correlates with the “behenate test”, the correlation is not robust enough to
justify its replacement of the “gold standard.” It is unclear whether the poor correlation between
tests relates to intermeal variability in fat excretion,or other factors; however the “behenate test”
may be suitable as a screening test for detection of fat malabsorption.