Skip to Main Content
 

Global Search Box

 
 
 

ETD Abstract Container

Abstract Header

The Biobehavioral Model of Persuasion: The Role of Cognitive Processing in Challenge and Threat Message Framing

Capiola, August
http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1538580946640221

Abstract Details

2018, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Wright State University, Human Factors and Industrial/Organizational Psychology PhD.
Persuasive messages are meant to influence people towards endorsing attitudes, intentions, and behaviors suggested in the message. However, describing the kinds of messages that are persuasive is not as helpful as understanding why certain messages are persuasive, yet others are not. The biobehavioral model of persuasion suggests that challenge-framed messages (messages that evoke low/moderate concern and high efficacy) are persuasive because they facilitate greater message elaboration leading to outcomes aligned with message suggestions. The following paragraphs outline the BMP and describe two experiments that tested the postulate that challenge-framed messages evoke greater message elaboration. In the first experiment (N = 160), messages framed to evoke different amounts of concern and efficacy were examined with an argument strength manipulation. It was hypothesized that the challenge-framed message would persuade people to adopt the suggestions in the message, and these effects would be strongest when the challenge-framed message was coupled with strong arguments. Although there was no evidence that challenge-framed messages were particularly effective when paired with strong arguments, the challenge-framed message did lead to greater interest in and perceived relevance of the message information and behaviors suggested in the message. A second experiment (N = 136) tested whether messages framed to evoke different levels of concern and efficacy lead to different peak pupil dilation, a measure of resource allocation. It was hypothesized that the challenge-framed message would lead to greater peak pupil dilation compared to other concern by efficacy frames. This hypothesis was not supported, likely because the messaging task lacked comparable methods with those from past research and imposed high cognitive demands across message conditions. Collectively, these results have implications for both basic and applied research. The findings from experiment 1 extend the BMP, showing that challenge-framed messages evoke responses characteristic of greater message elaboration. Persuasive campaigns should consider using challenge-framed messages, as these messages lead to components of greater message elaboration and behavioral engagement. Moreover, the findings from this dissertation highlight the need for comparable manipulation strength in factorial messaging designs. In addition, persuasion researchers who wish to incorporate pupillometry into their methodological repertoire must consider what procedural demands they impose on participants when testing message manipulations.
Tamera Schneider, Ph.D. (Committee Chair)
Joseph Houpt, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
Pamela Tsang, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
John Updegraff, Ph.D. (Committee Member)
118 p.
Psychology; Social Psychology
Persuasive messages; biobehavioral model of persuasion; challenge-framed messages

Recommended Citations

Citations

  • Capiola, A. (2018). The Biobehavioral Model of Persuasion: The Role of Cognitive Processing in Challenge and Threat Message Framing [Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1538580946640221

    APA Style (7th edition)

  • Capiola, August. The Biobehavioral Model of Persuasion: The Role of Cognitive Processing in Challenge and Threat Message Framing . 2018. Wright State University, Doctoral dissertation. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1538580946640221.

    MLA Style (8th edition)

  • Capiola, August. "The Biobehavioral Model of Persuasion: The Role of Cognitive Processing in Challenge and Threat Message Framing ." Doctoral dissertation, Wright State University, 2018. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1538580946640221

    Chicago Manual of Style (17th edition)

wright1538580946640221
309
© 2018, all rights reserved.
This open access ETD is published by Wright State University and OhioLINK.
Release 3.2.12